Canon Power. Shot Elph 3. HS Review & Rating. There's a compelling argument to be made for the demise of point- and- shoot cameras. Good And Safe Websites To Download Music there. It goes something like this: You've got a pretty good camera on your smartphone anyway, so why do you need a second device that doesn't offer much more? Canon surely knows that some people think that way, and the 1.
The sleek and small Canon PowerShot Elph 300 HS, with features slightly above entry level with a price to match, is a solid point-and-shoot digital camera. We’ve tested the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS, Canon’s successor to our top pick, the PowerShot ELPH 350 HS. The two are virtually identical in features and performance. November 20, 2015: Our new pick for the best superzoom camera is the Nikon Coolpix P610, which has all the most important features of a great superzoom whereas other.
URL=http:// Photo All-In-One review by PC Magazine URL=http:// Review Index URL=http.
Canon Power. Shot Elph 3. HS ($2. 49. 9. 9 direct) hints at the company's response. The 3. 00 HS offers speed, low- light performance, and ease of use that few, if any, phone cameras can match. The 3. 00 HS packs a lot of features into a small body, with good performance on all fronts and specs a step above many entry- level pocket cameras. Overall, it's a solid, simple, and affordable digital camera.
Design and Features. The very definition of pocket- friendly, the 3. HS measures 2. 2 by 3. HWD) and weighs just 4. It's available in red, black, and silver, and looks almost exactly like its younger brother, the Canon Power. Shot Elph 1. 00 HS ($1. The biggest cosmetic difference between the two is the feel of the 3.
HS—its finish is very coarse, almost like sandpaper. It makes the camera easier to grip, but it feels strange; the first reaction of everyone I handed the 3. HS to immediately ran their hands over it curiously. On the front of the camera are the lens and the built- in flash. The lens, the 3. 00 HS's primary upgrade from the less- expensive 1. HS, has a focal length of 2. It packs 5x optical zoom, a nice upgrade from the 4x on many compact cameras.
On top are the Power and Shutter buttons, the latter surrounded by the zoom trigger. A small cover on the left side hides the camera's connectivity ports: HDMI and USB. On the back are the rest of the controls including dedicated playback, Menu and Video Record buttons, a rocker to switch between Auto and Program shooting modes, and a five- way directional pad that toggles functions like macro and flash.
The Canon PowerShot Elph 310 HS ($259.99 direct) packs a lot of camera into a very small package. The slim 12-megapixel shooter manages to squeeze an 8x. The Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS (Est.
Also around back is the LCD, a 2. The screen is adequate, and it's clearly the largest display that could fit on such a small body, but it feels small next to the 3- inch LCD on a camera like the Editors' Choice Kodak Easy. Share M5. 80 ($1.
Canon's interface doesn't vary much across models, so the 3. HS will be instantly familiar to Canon users. It's heavily icon- based, with helpful explanations whenever you scroll over an icon. Some options are buried in several menus, but the most common functions either have dedicated buttons or are easily surfaced. Most standard features are available—scene modes, artistic effects and the like—plus one feature you won't find often: a Movie Digest Mode that shoots a brief video before each of your photos, and at the end of the day combines all the clips into a single video.
Performance. The name of the game, at least according to Canon, is speed. The Elph 3. 00 HS is extremely fast, in almost every operation. It takes an average of 2. Kodak M5. 80. The recycle time between shots averages 2. Sony Cyber- Shot DSC- T1.
Canon Power. Shot SD1. IS ($2. 29. 9. 9, 4 stars) took 3. The shutter lag score was closer to average at 0. At PCMag we use the Imatest suite to objectively analyze image quality. It analyzes 5. 0 spots throughout an image, and gives a center- weighted average of lines per picture height, an indication of the image's sharpness. The Power. Shot Elph 3. HS scored an average of 1,8.
That number's not as good as the Kodak M5. HS will deliver adequately sharp images. Imatest also measures the noise levels within an image, to test low- light performance. If Imatest measures more than 1. The 3. 00 HS could shoot photos up to ISO 8. Imatest's threshold, scoring 1. ISO 8. 00. At ISO 1.
Imatest measured 1. The 3. 00 HS certainly won't match up to D- SLR image quality in low- light scenarios, but it scored well for a compact camera. Videos can be recorded in two high- definition resolutions: 1. The camera is able to both autofocus and zoom while recording video, which makes for a much more camcorder- like experience.